Alexandre Penegre
Hill Taylor
English 101 Section 68
Island Civilization Response
There
is no doubt that humans have greatly impacted Earth’s environment, however, the
current ecofriendly movement developed only recently and because of the exponential
increase in technology, human pollution will gradually decrease. Of course the
question is if it is too late.
In
the past, humans did not understand science or size of the earth. “For
thousands of years the success of civilization seemed to mandate the
destruction of wild places, wild animals, and wild peoples.” Blame cannot be
put on them. It became the fault of humans after the Industrial Revolution when
many science topics were understood, such as pollution, yet was ignored. The
people who turned a blind eye to something they knew was wrong, are the people
to blame. How can humans in the distant past know the extent of the damage done
by clearing out forests for their cities?
The
exponential increase in technology can have a negative and positive effect. As
technology increase more products are going to be made which require materials
from the Earth which usually causes pollution to extract. Not only that, but when
it becomes outdated it will probably end up in a landfill to slowly disintegrate
after a few centuries. With every yin there is a yang. Technology can and is
producing products that help save the planet. Solar, wind, hydro, and
geothermal power are all thanks to technology. They are currently expensive and
not as effective as they can be but because of the rapid increase in technology
is should be affordable and more effective in about ten years, and probably
become as common as gasoline in twenty years.
Island
Civilization is a far-fetched dream that has an almost zero percent chance of occurring
to the point it shouldn’t even be considered.
Population growth is inevitable as better healthcare and medicine emerge.
Even though some countries such as France and Japan have experienced a small
decrease in population, third world countries such as ones located in South
America and Africa are getting their hands on technological innovations which
will increase their life expectancy and have safer deliveries. Once it becomes widespread in those
countries, the population will probably reach eight billion and not “…turn it
back to a total of about
1.5 billion…” The only way humans can
avoid overpopulating Earth to a point of instability is by colonizing other
planets such as Mars. Of course this will probably not take place for another
fifty years to a century, but the estimated population cap of Earth is
approximately elven to twelve billion which will hopefully not be reached by
that time.
None
of the other three scenarios seem probable because they are too extreme. The
only reason the wasteland scenario has somewhat chance of happening is due to
the nuclear buildup of both weapons and energy. The future primitive scenario
has no chance of happening, and as for the garden scenario, it is way too
extreme and environmental and animal rights activists will definitely not let
that happen. Although they are few people will listen to them.
If
humans don’t focus on the environment, global warming will probably cause a
mass extinction or the oil reserves will be emptied and forcibly change how
things are done. The Island Civilization idea would be a good theory a century
or two ago, however now, it is out of the question and should be simply
forgotten.
The opinions that have been asserted in the argument are one that I certainly agree with. I agree that the Island Colonization is not the most practical response to saving the earth. However, the only problem I find with the paper is that the claims that are made in terms of time frames or alternatives to the Island Scenario are ill supported.
ReplyDelete